<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digital Photography Show #42: How to Win Photo Contests and Win a Free Photo Class!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography tips &#038; tricks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-23989</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-23989</guid>
		<description>I’ve been hooked to your great show and have listened to all.  Some of the oddities I have observed are the reliance of post photo digital editing.  I know that these vendors can provide much as being a potential sponsor of your show.  Some will judge pictures without any digital editing, and will deduct points as more digital editing is performed.  From my interest, I like to see the most that can be done on the picture capture.  Anything after (digital editing), is perfection steered towards a specific audience…

Also, I am noticing quite a bias towards specific brands and cameras.  Many photographers make the most of what they have and can afford.  The gadget or photo junkies would the ones to constantly look to “what’s better” and “I think I should switch or upgrade”.  Professional photographers need to make money and can’t be hung up in the constant upgrade cost of their equipment…

Above certain grade of equipment, there is a “demised return” in what you get for what you paid.  Many of the lower end DSLRs would serve the greater masses listening to your shows.  In fact, many of your finalist on the photo contests used high end prosumer point &#38; shoots.  Credit needs to be given to vendors that are leading the digital photo movement, as Canon (I was a Canon 35mm shooter) and Nikon (now a Nikon digital shooter) are using quite a bit of technology from Olympus.  There is almost no credit or attention given to Olympus on your show.  Look at Live View and Sensor Cleaning technologies originated by Olympus.  Olympus’s attention is correctly given to providing the most camera for the best price.  Heck, if Nikon did not come out with the D40, I would not have moved up from my Coolpix 8800 to a Nikon DSLR (Olympus &#38; Canon entry level DSLRs were my considerations, in this order).  If too much play was given to high end DSLRs, then it would have been very discouraging to even move up to this level as the total cost of ownership would be overbearing.  It is very neat to see what you can get for a lesser cost, as opposed to what you can get for skies the limit prices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been hooked to your great show and have listened to all.  Some of the oddities I have observed are the reliance of post photo digital editing.  I know that these vendors can provide much as being a potential sponsor of your show.  Some will judge pictures without any digital editing, and will deduct points as more digital editing is performed.  From my interest, I like to see the most that can be done on the picture capture.  Anything after (digital editing), is perfection steered towards a specific audience…</p>
<p>Also, I am noticing quite a bias towards specific brands and cameras.  Many photographers make the most of what they have and can afford.  The gadget or photo junkies would the ones to constantly look to “what’s better” and “I think I should switch or upgrade”.  Professional photographers need to make money and can’t be hung up in the constant upgrade cost of their equipment…</p>
<p>Above certain grade of equipment, there is a “demised return” in what you get for what you paid.  Many of the lower end DSLRs would serve the greater masses listening to your shows.  In fact, many of your finalist on the photo contests used high end prosumer point &amp; shoots.  Credit needs to be given to vendors that are leading the digital photo movement, as Canon (I was a Canon 35mm shooter) and Nikon (now a Nikon digital shooter) are using quite a bit of technology from Olympus.  There is almost no credit or attention given to Olympus on your show.  Look at Live View and Sensor Cleaning technologies originated by Olympus.  Olympus’s attention is correctly given to providing the most camera for the best price.  Heck, if Nikon did not come out with the D40, I would not have moved up from my Coolpix 8800 to a Nikon DSLR (Olympus &amp; Canon entry level DSLRs were my considerations, in this order).  If too much play was given to high end DSLRs, then it would have been very discouraging to even move up to this level as the total cost of ownership would be overbearing.  It is very neat to see what you can get for a lesser cost, as opposed to what you can get for skies the limit prices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Seal</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-23340</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Seal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-23340</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott and Michael

I just found your website.  Great job on the show.  Learned a lot from your comments on the contest.

I had a different take on 'Jumping for Joy'.  My first reaction to the photo was that it was of the garter toss, and that the jumper was not the groom.  In either case its a great photo

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott and Michael</p>
<p>I just found your website.  Great job on the show.  Learned a lot from your comments on the contest.</p>
<p>I had a different take on &#8216;Jumping for Joy&#8217;.  My first reaction to the photo was that it was of the garter toss, and that the jumper was not the groom.  In either case its a great photo</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22858</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22858</guid>
		<description>Congrats Horst. I loved your picture, but couldn't quite say why. It was so good to hear them talk about it in such a way that made it clear what made it so good. 

Thanks guys for a great show. I'll do my best to get my entry in for the next contest. I tried for this one, but somehow life got in the way. I was also finding using GIMP very confusing. Is there anyone else on here who uses it? That might be a nice show to discuss some of the other photo processing software out there (like the free ones). 

Looking forward to the next shows. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats Horst. I loved your picture, but couldn&#8217;t quite say why. It was so good to hear them talk about it in such a way that made it clear what made it so good. </p>
<p>Thanks guys for a great show. I&#8217;ll do my best to get my entry in for the next contest. I tried for this one, but somehow life got in the way. I was also finding using GIMP very confusing. Is there anyone else on here who uses it? That might be a nice show to discuss some of the other photo processing software out there (like the free ones). </p>
<p>Looking forward to the next shows. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael GW Stein</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael GW Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22108</guid>
		<description>Hi Julian,

This is too funny.  I've seen the panda cams, but this is way more interesting to watch.  I do wish it we could see it played back sped up.  Now I had something to watch when we tape the show.

BTW, I still have my film camera loaded with Velvia 50.  I probably won't get through it until spring.  At something like 50 cents a frame, I'm being a bit careful with how I use it.  I'll let you know how it goes.

Thanks again for that great link.  I'll share it with the cheese folks this spring when we meet up to taste cheeses from Spain.

--Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julian,</p>
<p>This is too funny.  I&#8217;ve seen the panda cams, but this is way more interesting to watch.  I do wish it we could see it played back sped up.  Now I had something to watch when we tape the show.</p>
<p>BTW, I still have my film camera loaded with Velvia 50.  I probably won&#8217;t get through it until spring.  At something like 50 cents a frame, I&#8217;m being a bit careful with how I use it.  I&#8217;ll let you know how it goes.</p>
<p>Thanks again for that great link.  I&#8217;ll share it with the cheese folks this spring when we meet up to taste cheeses from Spain.</p>
<p>&#8211;Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22069</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22069</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Was listening to good old Radio 2 on my way down to a meeting yesterday and they gave the address of a website which allows you to actually watch a block of cheddar ripen over the space of a year!! This is the link to the blurb but within it is the link to the www.cheddarvision.tv webcam!! enjoy:

http://www.fwi.co.uk/blogs/rural-life/2007/01/say-cheese.html

Julian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Was listening to good old Radio 2 on my way down to a meeting yesterday and they gave the address of a website which allows you to actually watch a block of cheddar ripen over the space of a year!! This is the link to the blurb but within it is the link to the <a href="http://www.cheddarvision.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheddarvision.tv</a> webcam!! enjoy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fwi.co.uk/blogs/rural-life/2007/01/say-cheese.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fwi.co.uk/blogs/rural-life/2007/01/say-cheese.html</a></p>
<p>Julian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Despot</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Despot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22047</guid>
		<description>Kent, you asked if anyone was wtih you on the title thing.  I have to say that I am not.  I agree with Scott on this.  I name mine with what ever pots into my head at the moment.  Only once in a great while to I give it much thought.  I do it so that I can find the photo again easier.  
I also enjoyed hearing the photos discribed, my little mp3 player does not show photos adn I often listen while riding my bike or walking along the river.  
Keep up the great programing Scott and Michael.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent, you asked if anyone was wtih you on the title thing.  I have to say that I am not.  I agree with Scott on this.  I name mine with what ever pots into my head at the moment.  Only once in a great while to I give it much thought.  I do it so that I can find the photo again easier.<br />
I also enjoyed hearing the photos discribed, my little mp3 player does not show photos adn I often listen while riding my bike or walking along the river.<br />
Keep up the great programing Scott and Michael.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mttsylvstr</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22022</link>
		<dc:creator>mttsylvstr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-22022</guid>
		<description>I'm a big fan of your show. I've only been listening for a couple of months, but I've gone back and listened to almost all of the podcasts. I just have one (odd) comment and one request. The comment is that I had looked at your phanfare pictures shortly after discovering the show and I somehow mixed up who was Scott and who was Mike from the posted photos. What's strange is that somehow your voices and personalities seemed to "match" my (mixed up) understanding of who was who. Now that I've realized my mistake I'm having a hard time re-adjusting to reality–it doesn't seem right to me. As for the request–I would like to hear more about lenses. A lot of us don't have the opportunity to actually look through or play with the wide assortment of lenses that are available and frankly I'm somewhat baffled sometimes trying to figure out why someone might prefer one lens over another. There seems to be a lot of "overlap". Maybe this fog will clear up as I become a more experienced photographer, but I would imagine many of your listeners find themself in the same boat. thanks for the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of your show. I&#8217;ve only been listening for a couple of months, but I&#8217;ve gone back and listened to almost all of the podcasts. I just have one (odd) comment and one request. The comment is that I had looked at your phanfare pictures shortly after discovering the show and I somehow mixed up who was Scott and who was Mike from the posted photos. What&#8217;s strange is that somehow your voices and personalities seemed to &#8220;match&#8221; my (mixed up) understanding of who was who. Now that I&#8217;ve realized my mistake I&#8217;m having a hard time re-adjusting to reality–it doesn&#8217;t seem right to me. As for the request–I would like to hear more about lenses. A lot of us don&#8217;t have the opportunity to actually look through or play with the wide assortment of lenses that are available and frankly I&#8217;m somewhat baffled sometimes trying to figure out why someone might prefer one lens over another. There seems to be a lot of &#8220;overlap&#8221;. Maybe this fog will clear up as I become a more experienced photographer, but I would imagine many of your listeners find themself in the same boat. thanks for the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landya</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21961</link>
		<dc:creator>Landya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21961</guid>
		<description>I need to listen to the show.  Look forward to it.  I must say, the photo by Frank Fennema and the bridge is simply wonderful.  I will be eager to hear how something else could have prevailed over that one.  Amazing how different people have entirely different tastes and perspectives.  Off to listen and learn!  Congratulations to the winner -- whose photo is also wonderful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to listen to the show.  Look forward to it.  I must say, the photo by Frank Fennema and the bridge is simply wonderful.  I will be eager to hear how something else could have prevailed over that one.  Amazing how different people have entirely different tastes and perspectives.  Off to listen and learn!  Congratulations to the winner &#8212; whose photo is also wonderful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21771</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21771</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, all. I did think Chuck was an OUTSTANDING guest - and a great guy. 

Kent, I get your point, but many people listen in their cars or at the gym and can't look at the computer while they are listening. 

As to your second point, I think photography can be used artfully or poorly, as can words. I think a good title can elevate or illuminate a picture - as in "Stop in the Name of Love" from our contest. It makes the visual pun clearer. 

Of course, a title can also be mundane and ordinary, in which case I agree it doesn't help. Some photographers probably do feel the need to title EVERYTHING, which is a mistake. I don't need to know that a picture of a tree is called "Tree." 

In the case of the photographer you mention, I am not familiar with his work, but if he's selling his prints, it may just be that's its easier for people to order them if they're named. 

By the way, I am entitling this post "Post."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, all. I did think Chuck was an OUTSTANDING guest - and a great guy. </p>
<p>Kent, I get your point, but many people listen in their cars or at the gym and can&#8217;t look at the computer while they are listening. </p>
<p>As to your second point, I think photography can be used artfully or poorly, as can words. I think a good title can elevate or illuminate a picture - as in &#8220;Stop in the Name of Love&#8221; from our contest. It makes the visual pun clearer. </p>
<p>Of course, a title can also be mundane and ordinary, in which case I agree it doesn&#8217;t help. Some photographers probably do feel the need to title EVERYTHING, which is a mistake. I don&#8217;t need to know that a picture of a tree is called &#8220;Tree.&#8221; </p>
<p>In the case of the photographer you mention, I am not familiar with his work, but if he&#8217;s selling his prints, it may just be that&#8217;s its easier for people to order them if they&#8217;re named. </p>
<p>By the way, I am entitling this post &#8220;Post.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21573</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21573</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

What's that cliche about a picture is worth a thousand words... a lot of time going into describing photos for the contest that could have been viewed in seconds, I assume if the audience can recieve podcasts they can view images as well.  Time is money and all, etc.  But keep up the show.
What I really wanted to express is an unrelated pet peev that was lightly touched on by Chuck during the show,  something perhaps worth discussing on a future show -  Titling photographs.  In my opinion NOTHING speaks more of "cheese" and amature photos than titling your shots, and the titles are always so God awful:  "Reflections", "Dreams", or some pop song title like "Afternoon Delight" or "Yesterday". Gag.  Case in point, have you ever seen Thomas Mangelsen's nature work, some nice photos but the titles are horrendous, laughable really.  Someone should have a word with that guy (but I would be willing to bet Mangelsen himself has fully reseached the topic and found that on average photo sales increased by 17.3% on all images with cheeseball titles, so touche Tom!)  Let's have some spine people.
Is anybody with me or am I all alone here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that cliche about a picture is worth a thousand words&#8230; a lot of time going into describing photos for the contest that could have been viewed in seconds, I assume if the audience can recieve podcasts they can view images as well.  Time is money and all, etc.  But keep up the show.<br />
What I really wanted to express is an unrelated pet peev that was lightly touched on by Chuck during the show,  something perhaps worth discussing on a future show -  Titling photographs.  In my opinion NOTHING speaks more of &#8220;cheese&#8221; and amature photos than titling your shots, and the titles are always so God awful:  &#8220;Reflections&#8221;, &#8220;Dreams&#8221;, or some pop song title like &#8220;Afternoon Delight&#8221; or &#8220;Yesterday&#8221;. Gag.  Case in point, have you ever seen Thomas Mangelsen&#8217;s nature work, some nice photos but the titles are horrendous, laughable really.  Someone should have a word with that guy (but I would be willing to bet Mangelsen himself has fully reseached the topic and found that on average photo sales increased by 17.3% on all images with cheeseball titles, so touche Tom!)  Let&#8217;s have some spine people.<br />
Is anybody with me or am I all alone here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21489</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21489</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Horst! It was a great show, and very informative. Chuck was a great guest judge, and Michael and Scott, you guys are always good! :-)

I always look forward to your weekly podcast.

Holly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Horst! It was a great show, and very informative. Chuck was a great guest judge, and Michael and Scott, you guys are always good! :-)</p>
<p>I always look forward to your weekly podcast.</p>
<p>Holly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Despot</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Despot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21455</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Horst Fuchs for winning with his great photo.  I really enjoyed this show today.  The photos were all so well done and listening to the judging was very informative.  
Thanks for all of the great information, I will be looking forward to the next contest.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Horst Fuchs for winning with his great photo.  I really enjoyed this show today.  The photos were all so well done and listening to the judging was very informative.<br />
Thanks for all of the great information, I will be looking forward to the next contest.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21448</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Horst! Your photo was fantastic...and congratulations to all the finalists.

Good show, guys. I enjoyed hearing Chuck analyze the contest entries.

What are the chances your listeners could get a discount at NYIP?

Keep up the good work, Scott and Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Horst! Your photo was fantastic&#8230;and congratulations to all the finalists.</p>
<p>Good show, guys. I enjoyed hearing Chuck analyze the contest entries.</p>
<p>What are the chances your listeners could get a discount at NYIP?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, Scott and Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horst Fuchs</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21433</link>
		<dc:creator>Horst Fuchs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2007/03/12/the-digital-photography-show-42-how-to-win-photo-contests-and-win-a-free-photo-class/#comment-21433</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott and Michael

It was very very exciting to listen to your show today. Due to time shift I couldn't listen to the show on Sunday evening so I started on Monday morning early. I downloaded the show with my mobile phone via WLAN while standing under the shower and listened to it while driving to work. BUT, the show wasn't downloaded completely so I had to wait to continue listening at work. My hands were getting wetter and wetter when coming to the end as I wondered who was the final winner of the photo contest. 

I wanted to say thank you for choosing my photo. I was very impressed about your comments to it. I'm really looking forward to get that terrific price I won.

Keep up the great shows and greetings from South-Germany
-Horst Fuchs
(and yes Scott, you pronounced my Name correct)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott and Michael</p>
<p>It was very very exciting to listen to your show today. Due to time shift I couldn&#8217;t listen to the show on Sunday evening so I started on Monday morning early. I downloaded the show with my mobile phone via WLAN while standing under the shower and listened to it while driving to work. BUT, the show wasn&#8217;t downloaded completely so I had to wait to continue listening at work. My hands were getting wetter and wetter when coming to the end as I wondered who was the final winner of the photo contest. </p>
<p>I wanted to say thank you for choosing my photo. I was very impressed about your comments to it. I&#8217;m really looking forward to get that terrific price I won.</p>
<p>Keep up the great shows and greetings from South-Germany<br />
-Horst Fuchs<br />
(and yes Scott, you pronounced my Name correct)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
