<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digital Photography Show #82:  PMA News, What&#8217;s Next for Digital Cameras and Creamy Canon Goodness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography tips &#38; tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:53:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-61377</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-61377</guid>
		<description>Great Show this week, guys, as always.

Very interesting that you had some comments on HDR. I have been doing some occasional experimenting with HDR since last fall. As you said, Michael, the tonemapping is the major challenge Â´and it takes quite some practice to get it right. Also, the post-processing (in Photoshop/elements) is the CRITICAL BIT. I usually set my D200 to do 5 exposures  (preferably on tripod, but handheld sometimes works) at -2,-1, 0, +1, +2: this is where exposure bracketing on aperture priority works a treat on the D200. Some folks prefer the artsy shots, some prefer to enhance the clarity of a shot through extended dynamic range. There is a lot of discussion on the forums as to &#039;what is real HDR?&#039;. My take: HDR is whatever works for YOU. And never forget that HDR will not make a good shot out of a bad shot! I can recommend a couple of links on how to do it: Stuck in Customs has the best HDR tutorial and also includes a link for a photomatix discount coupon. http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/. Flickr also has a lot of HDR ideas in its HDR group (Joerg Dickmann,  James Neeley,  are among the best contributors. Pete Carr does some amazing stuff and has a good tutorial in http://www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/. Finally, take a look at some of mine - to see what a novice like me can get up to: it&#039;s a lot of fun and has added a brand new dimension to my enjoyment and appreciation of photography - so that has to be a good thing - right? Most, but not all, are HDR: http://www.flickr.com/photos/eldubyer/

Very much looking forward to hearing your comments and insights as you get into this cool field of digital photography.

Best,

Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Show this week, guys, as always.</p>
<p>Very interesting that you had some comments on HDR. I have been doing some occasional experimenting with HDR since last fall. As you said, Michael, the tonemapping is the major challenge Â´and it takes quite some practice to get it right. Also, the post-processing (in Photoshop/elements) is the CRITICAL BIT. I usually set my D200 to do 5 exposures  (preferably on tripod, but handheld sometimes works) at -2,-1, 0, +1, +2: this is where exposure bracketing on aperture priority works a treat on the D200. Some folks prefer the artsy shots, some prefer to enhance the clarity of a shot through extended dynamic range. There is a lot of discussion on the forums as to &#8216;what is real HDR?&#8217;. My take: HDR is whatever works for YOU. And never forget that HDR will not make a good shot out of a bad shot! I can recommend a couple of links on how to do it: Stuck in Customs has the best HDR tutorial and also includes a link for a photomatix discount coupon. <a href="http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/" rel="nofollow">http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/</a>. Flickr also has a lot of HDR ideas in its HDR group (Joerg Dickmann,  James Neeley,  are among the best contributors. Pete Carr does some amazing stuff and has a good tutorial in <a href="http://www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/</a>. Finally, take a look at some of mine &#8211; to see what a novice like me can get up to: it&#8217;s a lot of fun and has added a brand new dimension to my enjoyment and appreciation of photography &#8211; so that has to be a good thing &#8211; right? Most, but not all, are HDR: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eldubyer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/eldubyer/</a></p>
<p>Very much looking forward to hearing your comments and insights as you get into this cool field of digital photography.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57623</guid>
		<description>I just realized that I didn&#039;t add my thanks for another well-designed and delivered show, so thanks again to Scott and Michael for all that you do!  (By the way though...I feel special since I got an extended version of the show, since the one I listened to lasted a lot longer than eighty seconds! *grin*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized that I didn&#8217;t add my thanks for another well-designed and delivered show, so thanks again to Scott and Michael for all that you do!  (By the way though&#8230;I feel special since I got an extended version of the show, since the one I listened to lasted a lot longer than eighty seconds! *grin*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryG</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57560</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57560</guid>
		<description>TonyH...thanks for the advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TonyH&#8230;thanks for the advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hammel</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57502</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hammel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57502</guid>
		<description>Hello Scott and Michael, I found your show on itunes and decided to check out the show.   Great show! I&#039;m hooked and decided to go back and download them all, so far I got 10 shows under my belt and plan on catching up to show #82</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Scott and Michael, I found your show on itunes and decided to check out the show.   Great show! I&#8217;m hooked and decided to go back and download them all, so far I got 10 shows under my belt and plan on catching up to show #82</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57415</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57415</guid>
		<description>Couple of comments:

I agree that Michael sounded much better when you are both recording together.  I&#039;ve heard other podcasters who do team, remote podcasts mention the 2 track audio thing too.  That being said, I think the biggest thing wasn&#039;t the technical quality, but just the obvious friendly interaction the 2 of you had.  Its just easier to have a good time when you&#039;re together, not separated by a phone line and 400 miles!!!

Second thing:  Scott (and Michael, too), I&#039;d be interested in hearing your comments on your time with the new Canon Rebel XSI.  Scott, your comments would be particularly enlightening since you bought the 40D last summer.  How do they stack up? From what I&#039;ve read (and Rudy Winston&#039;s comments), it sounds as if a lot of features in the 40D made it into the new Rebel. If you had it do again, would you still buy the more expensive camera?  Or does the XSI bring down enough features (in your limited experience with it, that is), that you regret your purchase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of comments:</p>
<p>I agree that Michael sounded much better when you are both recording together.  I&#8217;ve heard other podcasters who do team, remote podcasts mention the 2 track audio thing too.  That being said, I think the biggest thing wasn&#8217;t the technical quality, but just the obvious friendly interaction the 2 of you had.  Its just easier to have a good time when you&#8217;re together, not separated by a phone line and 400 miles!!!</p>
<p>Second thing:  Scott (and Michael, too), I&#8217;d be interested in hearing your comments on your time with the new Canon Rebel XSI.  Scott, your comments would be particularly enlightening since you bought the 40D last summer.  How do they stack up? From what I&#8217;ve read (and Rudy Winston&#8217;s comments), it sounds as if a lot of features in the 40D made it into the new Rebel. If you had it do again, would you still buy the more expensive camera?  Or does the XSI bring down enough features (in your limited experience with it, that is), that you regret your purchase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57388</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57388</guid>
		<description>Yes I can&#039;t get episode #2 either.  Doesn&#039;t show up in iTunes or on the show&#039;s blog posting.  Really want to hear that one since I&#039;m reading some of Bryan Peterson&#039;s books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I can&#8217;t get episode #2 either.  Doesn&#8217;t show up in iTunes or on the show&#8217;s blog posting.  Really want to hear that one since I&#8217;m reading some of Bryan Peterson&#8217;s books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57307</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57307</guid>
		<description>Hey guys,

Thanks for all the hard work on the show!  It truly shows because each week is another great episode.

One suggestion I have for a guest is Vincent Versace.  If you have not read his book, Welcome To Oz, and you have any interest in photography/Photoshop, then it is a must read!  The best photoshop book I have ever read, I can&#039;t put it down.  Very detailed, but he really breaks down the photos into an artistic component, not just &#039;put this effect here and that one there...&#039;  You really learn about the art of photography and the true digital darkroom.

Also, does anyone else have troubles downloading episode #2 with Brian Peterson?  He is another favorite author and I would love to listen to that episode, but it does not show up in my Itunes.

Have a great weekend.
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>Thanks for all the hard work on the show!  It truly shows because each week is another great episode.</p>
<p>One suggestion I have for a guest is Vincent Versace.  If you have not read his book, Welcome To Oz, and you have any interest in photography/Photoshop, then it is a must read!  The best photoshop book I have ever read, I can&#8217;t put it down.  Very detailed, but he really breaks down the photos into an artistic component, not just &#8216;put this effect here and that one there&#8230;&#8217;  You really learn about the art of photography and the true digital darkroom.</p>
<p>Also, does anyone else have troubles downloading episode #2 with Brian Peterson?  He is another favorite author and I would love to listen to that episode, but it does not show up in my Itunes.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend.<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin D. Bloom</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57300</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin D. Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57300</guid>
		<description>Count me in for a meetup in Vermont.  If I&#039;m available, I&#039;m there.

Thanks for covering PMA.  Looking forward to listening to the interviews!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me in for a meetup in Vermont.  If I&#8217;m available, I&#8217;m there.</p>
<p>Thanks for covering PMA.  Looking forward to listening to the interviews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57245</guid>
		<description>The Online Photographer - great resource, but sometimes kind of &quot;heady&quot; - makes you think.  It&#039;s an excellent resource though if you like to read - very well written too! http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Online Photographer &#8211; great resource, but sometimes kind of &#8220;heady&#8221; &#8211; makes you think.  It&#8217;s an excellent resource though if you like to read &#8211; very well written too! <a href="http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyH</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57244</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57244</guid>
		<description>Hi MaryB,

I bought the Canon G9 to take to Cancun this last weekend.  I didn&#039;t want to bring my Nikon D80 because I was planning to be in the water or on the beach everyday.  I decided on the G9 because of the waterproof housing that was available.  The pictures came out very nice in auto mode and the video was also decent.  The only think I don&#039;t like about the G9 is the size.  It is not that much smaller then my D80, except for the 18-200mm lens I usually have on the D80.  While in the housing they are basically the same size, but the G9 is element proof.  If you shoot in RAW or want to shoot time-lapse video, get the G9.  If you want something to carry in a pocket or purse, go fo something much smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi MaryB,</p>
<p>I bought the Canon G9 to take to Cancun this last weekend.  I didn&#8217;t want to bring my Nikon D80 because I was planning to be in the water or on the beach everyday.  I decided on the G9 because of the waterproof housing that was available.  The pictures came out very nice in auto mode and the video was also decent.  The only think I don&#8217;t like about the G9 is the size.  It is not that much smaller then my D80, except for the 18-200mm lens I usually have on the D80.  While in the housing they are basically the same size, but the G9 is element proof.  If you shoot in RAW or want to shoot time-lapse video, get the G9.  If you want something to carry in a pocket or purse, go fo something much smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57221</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57221</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

I saw the link at the Daring Fireball site;  TOP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>I saw the link at the Daring Fireball site;  TOP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57159</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott and Michael,

Great show - always fun to hear from Rudy - I swear he could be a DJ, he&#039;s got that kind of voice about him.  Easy to understand and listen to - I can see why Canon picked him as a pitch man for PMA and the rest.  Makes you want to go out and buy the entire lineup!  Thanks again for all that you guys do.

Hey Paul, looks like you read TOP too.  I saw the B&amp;H link referenced on there, so figured you saw that too! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott and Michael,</p>
<p>Great show &#8211; always fun to hear from Rudy &#8211; I swear he could be a DJ, he&#8217;s got that kind of voice about him.  Easy to understand and listen to &#8211; I can see why Canon picked him as a pitch man for PMA and the rest.  Makes you want to go out and buy the entire lineup!  Thanks again for all that you guys do.</p>
<p>Hey Paul, looks like you read TOP too.  I saw the B&amp;H link referenced on there, so figured you saw that too! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bousquet</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57109</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bousquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57109</guid>
		<description>Great show guys.  After hearing the interview with Rudy Winston and the new super duper lenses, I saw this link and thought everyone would enjoy it.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/find/newsLetter/Mother-of-All-L-Lenses.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show guys.  After hearing the interview with Rudy Winston and the new super duper lenses, I saw this link and thought everyone would enjoy it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/find/newsLetter/Mother-of-All-L-Lenses.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/find/newsLetter/Mother-of-All-L-Lenses.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe O'C</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57107</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe O'C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57107</guid>
		<description>Guys,

If you had a meetup in Vermont. I would definately be interested. Vermont is a great place to take photos.

JPO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>If you had a meetup in Vermont. I would definately be interested. Vermont is a great place to take photos.</p>
<p>JPO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landya</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57094</link>
		<dc:creator>Landya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57094</guid>
		<description>I have not yet heard the show, but it is in my iPod as of this morning.

But, I am posting this fabulous video tutorial on flash basics for those of us who listen to photographers talk about flash and still wonder what a &quot;snoot&quot; is and how a remote flash trigger works.
http://www.pduncan.com/strobiststart/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not yet heard the show, but it is in my iPod as of this morning.</p>
<p>But, I am posting this fabulous video tutorial on flash basics for those of us who listen to photographers talk about flash and still wonder what a &#8220;snoot&#8221; is and how a remote flash trigger works.<br />
<a href="http://www.pduncan.com/strobiststart/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pduncan.com/strobiststart/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth Roxburgh-Kidd</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57089</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth Roxburgh-Kidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57089</guid>
		<description>Mike sounds GREAT. I&#039;d love to hear more of that. 

One of the better options is Skype end-to-end, tweaking for good behaviour. Doug Kaye and Michael Figgiani have a brilliant presentation on this:  

http://www.slideshare.net/dkaye/skype-for-interviews

If you can&#039;t use Skype end-to-end, use the &quot;double-ender&quot; technique: record on both ends of the phone call, then merge the two high quality recordings. 

(Scott, record your voice to the left channel and Mike&#039;s voice to the right channel. When Mike&#039;s audio arrives, insert and cut out short delays to line it up with your phone-quality version. Then throw away the phone audio, flatten, and run The Levelator. Easy!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike sounds GREAT. I&#8217;d love to hear more of that. </p>
<p>One of the better options is Skype end-to-end, tweaking for good behaviour. Doug Kaye and Michael Figgiani have a brilliant presentation on this:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dkaye/skype-for-interviews" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/dkaye/skype-for-interviews</a></p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t use Skype end-to-end, use the &#8220;double-ender&#8221; technique: record on both ends of the phone call, then merge the two high quality recordings. </p>
<p>(Scott, record your voice to the left channel and Mike&#8217;s voice to the right channel. When Mike&#8217;s audio arrives, insert and cut out short delays to line it up with your phone-quality version. Then throw away the phone audio, flatten, and run The Levelator. Easy!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Taylor</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57068</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57068</guid>
		<description>Another great episode... Looking forward to the Nikon interview!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great episode&#8230; Looking forward to the Nikon interview!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryG</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57050</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57050</guid>
		<description>Need some advice from my fellow DPS fans: I need a new point and shoot camera for when I want to travel light. I&#039;m trying to decide between the Nikon Coolpix 5100 and the Canon Powershoot G9. Does anyone out there have any experience with these cameras that they&#039;d like to share? I&#039;m also open to other suggestions. My previous point and shoot was a Canon SD550 which I found to be a disappointment for many reasons. I&#039;ve gone on the various review sites and it appears to be a toss-up. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need some advice from my fellow DPS fans: I need a new point and shoot camera for when I want to travel light. I&#8217;m trying to decide between the Nikon Coolpix 5100 and the Canon Powershoot G9. Does anyone out there have any experience with these cameras that they&#8217;d like to share? I&#8217;m also open to other suggestions. My previous point and shoot was a Canon SD550 which I found to be a disappointment for many reasons. I&#8217;ve gone on the various review sites and it appears to be a toss-up. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/comment-page-1/#comment-57014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/02/05/the-digital-photography-show-82-pma-news-whats-next-for-digital-cameras-and-creamy-canon-goodness/#comment-57014</guid>
		<description>What can you possibly cover in 80 seconds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can you possibly cover in 80 seconds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
