<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Review of the Nikon D60</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography tips &#038; tricks</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59368</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59368</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Neyuttad. Actually, you are right that the Panasonic doesn't include body-based IS, but the kit lens, which, as you say, is a very nice Leica, does have it. I have updated the post with your correction. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Neyuttad. Actually, you are right that the Panasonic doesn&#8217;t include body-based IS, but the kit lens, which, as you say, is a very nice Leica, does have it. I have updated the post with your correction. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59362</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for the link Scott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for the link Scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neyuttad</title>
		<link>http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59351</link>
		<dc:creator>neyuttad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digiphoto.thepodcastnetwork.com/2008/03/04/first-review-of-the-nikon-d60/#comment-59351</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott and Michael,

I just wanted to point out that although Panasonic's dSLR are compliant with the Olympus' Four-Third standard, their bodies DO NOT have built-in IS. They instead rely on the IS in their very high-end Leica lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott and Michael,</p>
<p>I just wanted to point out that although Panasonic&#8217;s dSLR are compliant with the Olympus&#8217; Four-Third standard, their bodies DO NOT have built-in IS. They instead rely on the IS in their very high-end Leica lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
